The Museum of London, June 2018

Museum Musings

I (Karma) first went to the Museum of London in 2006. On its grounds are the remains of the original Roman Wall.

The Roman Wall, from a 2007 trip

When Courtney and Liam suggested we go there this June, I was excited about the exhibition, London Nights. I quickly discovered, however, that the Museum had undergone a massive renovation since I’d last been there–it was much bigger, much grander, but still had its senses of wonder and humor.

This Museum tells the history of London itself, from its “prehistory” days through the Romans, the dark ages, the Enlightenment and the ages after.

London is a grand city, deserving of this grand museum.

I saw the Harry Potter play in this theatre, The Palace.

“Teddy Boys,” though they look like T-Birds to me.

London Nights is an amazing photography exhibit, featuring antique pictures of London at night, from the days of early photography from now. Our favorite sections were the oldest photos, the collection of pictures from the infamous Night Bus by Nick Turpin, and Damien Frost‘s photographs of London’s Drag Queens.

by Nick Turpin

by Damien Frost

The Museum also had a small exhibit about a current plague on the city–Fatbergs.

It is my sad duty to inform you that fatbergs are collections of solid toxic waste in sewers, clogging London and the developed world–the problem is exacerbated by our use of wipes instead of paper. They had dried samples at the museum, in layers of protective glass, to protect us from ourselves.

This exhibit is arguably one from the anthropocene–a newish term for our time, in which we acknowledge that humans have forever altered and harmed the Earth for our own purposes. The term is contentious, but it’s hard to disagree with its use when one encounters a fatberg.

After considering our waste, we retreated into the past to feel slightly better about ourselves, encountering

  • statues of the cardinal virtues, standing on what I guess are demons–they certainly don’t like whatever is happening to them (the placard said who the virtues were, but nothing about the dudes they were balancing upon);
  • a stylized re-creation of a Victorian-era pleasure garden*;

    In Xanadu did Kubla Khan
    A stately pleasure-dome decree:
    Where Alph, the sacred river, ran
    Through caverns measureless to man
    Down to a sunless sea.

    A damsel with a dulcimer
    In a vision once I saw:
    It was an Abyssinian maid
    And on her dulcimer she played,
    Singing of Mount Abora.

  • the famous London stone, which has a twitter account;
  • an old “on this site” stone, about how they totally executed a patsy for the Great London Fire (this stone had to be removed had to be removed from the street in the mid-1700s–readers were causing “traffic jams”);

    Bragging about scapegoating–Americans are definitely descended from these folks

  • an exhibit on how they made the amazing opening of the 2012 London Paralympic Games; 

    some of the Olympic cones used to create the torch

and many other treasures.

Then, on our way to Nando’s, we stopped to take some pictures of and with St. Paul’s.

This obscenity is aimed at the photographer, dear reader.

St. Paul’s

Note: Like most UK museums, the museum was free–only the London Nights special exhibit required cash.

 

*Victorians were weird. They were in great denial about their obsession with sex. (Well, maybe not so weird. The South has the highest rates of sexual issues (unplanned pregnancies etc.) in the U.S., and Utah has the most porn searches, so hypocrisy is technically normal.)

They were big on gardens, nature, and pleasure, though, combining a burgeoning understanding of the natural world through science (this was the period where they named every damn kind of fern, remember) with the ability to talk about reproduction–in plants, at least.

In the UK, by the way, gardens are gardens, but they are also yards. And British people love them in all of their forms, as evidenced by this wonderful song by Laura Mvula.

Talk of the famous pleasure gardens (elaborate playgrounds for the rich) always reminds me of Samuel Taylor Coleridge’s “Kubla Khan.”

Coleridge said he awoke from a dream and started writing the poem down in a fury, until he was interrupted by a knock on the door, causing the poem to be forever unfinished.

One of my professors once gave a lecture about how it’s a metaphor for writing. Khan calls forth the dome by fiat, like god creates, like writers write.

Go back and read it again.

I’ll wait.

The writer metaphor theory is sound.

My theory is equally sound, however.

As I have explained to several classes, this poem is about wet dreams.

Go read it again.

There’s a pleasure dome, with its sexy gardens and romantic chasms and references to sex with incubi. Hot Abyssinian maids . . . fast thick pants and mighty fountains:

“And from this chasm, with ceaseless turmoil seething,
As if this earth in fast thick pants were breathing,
A mighty fountain momently was forced . . .”
Mayhaps he spent too much time in a pleasure garden that day.
Share
1 comment

Continuing Adventures in OnLine Dating: 83

dating

I just don’t even know what to say about this one. Here’s the entire conversation:

Him: Very nice!
Love your hair and that lovely smile too!
Care to chat?

Me: Hi, Sean.
I’m about to head out to a physical therapy appointment (for TMJ).
You are very cute, but Napa is pretty far away to try to have a relationship. I only manage to get out there once or twice a year.

Him: I am moving to sac.:)
text me…[redacted]

Me: When are you moving?

Him: end of the year 

Text me [redacted] let’s meet tonight

Me: I don’t agree to meet people without knowing something about them–there have to be a few messages with some content first.
And I’m on my computer more than my phone (I’m working), so texting wouldn’t make anything go faster. What are the things we have in common?

Him: I just want to get together and have some fun is hard as it is this online dating thing so if you’re interested text me and let’s meet

Me: If we met at a bar, you’d have to talk to me for a few minutes to get my number and a date. Why is that so odd to want here?

Him: I’m not here to negotiate why how where and when I just want to meet women and have fun…

Me: Ok–I think we are on here for different reasons then–or at least with different dating styles. I wish you luck in your search. I hope you find a beautiful and spontaneous woman! Have a great rest of your day!

Him: K

[Ten minutes later.]

Him: Do you have any knowledge with electric cars and hybrid

Me: Just that they exist.

Him: I’m sure you’re aware of their basic efficiency lost in every one of their component… an average of 10% or so

Me: No–I’m not into cars, so I don’t know much about any make/model.

Him: And maybe I could pick your head over it

I’m all about the efficiency and need second brain

Me: I don’t like or care about cars, though. So I’m not interested in talking about them.

I’m still not certain what went on here. Is he on the spectrum, or did he think I would find an electric car conversation alluring enough to agree to a date? Or both?

Share
0 comments

The Continuing Adventures of Online Dating (82): How to Lose a Girl in One Day

dating

I should really just start ignoring conversations that begin inauspiciously.

Yesterday, a guy opened with this:

“Hi this is Garry looking for friendship first if we click we can go from there

“Hello dear are you seriously interested to get together soon”

I tried to patiently explain that I can’t be interested in someone before I even exchange messages with them.

Then, I had to explain that I would not be giving him my phone number.

“Tell honestly since how long are you on this dating site? Did u talk any one face to face”

Serious lack of empathy here–some guys think that if you won’t meet them right away, if you won’t give them your phone number right away, that you aren’t serious about dating. Do their demands ever work? Are other women saying yes with no preamble?

And then: “When u had dated last time seriously as romantic way”

Me: I am not sure what you mean. Are you asking when I last had a date or when I was last in a relationship?

“When you had dated last time sexually? And also when u was in relationship???”

Me: It’s rude to ask someone when they last had sex.
I broke up with my last boyfriend three months ago.

“Any way on first date normally Just to hug kisses or more then that you likevto do honestly?”

Me: Look, I know you aren’t trying to make me feel uncomfortable, but you are, so I am not going to continue this conversation. I hope you find the right person for you.

He didn’t get that he was being obtuse or creepy at all. Based on the grammar/esl stuff, I figure there are cultural differences. But come on. A woman says it takes a little conversation. But the only conversation you want to have is about when she last had sex and if she puts out on the first date? In what culture is that NOT creepy?

Share
1 comment

Karma Reads: The Perfect Nanny by Leila Slimani

Words, words, words

I first heard about this novel on NPR. The reviewer read the first sentence, and I’ll start with that too: “The baby is dead.”

It’s in medias res storytelling–starting quite close to the end and then circling back, and this classic structure works well for the tale.

I know a lot of my friends who have recently had children won’t be able to read this, but if it helps, you don’t actually see what happens to the child(ren). You only know that something did.

This novel was originally written in French and won the Goncourt, making Slimani the first Moroccan woman to win, though it wasn’t her first award.

Slimani is also a journalist, which perhaps explains her eye for detail and her fluid prose.

In short, the novel explores several modern-world tensions. What happens when a woman doesn’t want to just stay home with her children? How do you choose “the perfect nanny”? If the nanny is too perfect, how do you keep yourself from depending on her too much or from exploiting her generosity? Who should decide what the children eat? The person who buys the food or the person who cooks it? Do you really want someone to feel like family or do you secretly want deference and respect? How do you navigate intimate employees in a world where race and class and power conspire to confound us?

Share
0 comments

What Would Margaret Atwood Do?

Politics and other nonsense, Words, words, words

It’s been a difficult week here in pre-Gilead.

And it’s only Thursday morning.

I’m tempted to stop watching and reading the news. And I understand why many friends have.

But I’m an Atwoodian.

So when it occurred to me that I should take a “break” from reality for my mental health, a little voice said, “careful, June.”

June/Offred, in The Handmaid’s Tale, was passive, like so many of us are. She was lulled into accepting roadblocks as necessary after a terrorist attack–they became normal. And when the government started attacking women’s rights, she didn’t go to the marches–she tried to distract herself with baking, with her daughter’s lunches. And then they started opening fire on the protestors.

She tried to act too late.

“We lived, as usual, by ignoring. Ignoring isn’t the same as ignorance, you have to work at it. Nothing changes instantaneously: in a gradually heating bathtub you’d be boiled to death before you knew it” (74).

Jimmy/Snowman, in Oryx and Crake, is the same, except as a male, he is more protected. He is privileged enough to be obtuse, to not ask, when his friend says sterilizing people without their knowledge is “step one”: “Wait, what’s step 2? And where do these steps lead?”

And then it’s too late.

“How could I have missed it? Snowman thinks. What he was telling me. How could I have been so stupid? No, not stupid. He can’t describe himself, the way he’d been. Not unmarked–events had marked him, he’d had his own scars, his dark emotions. Ignorant, perhaps. Unformed, inchoate. There had been something willed about it though, his ignorance. Or not willed, exactly: structured. He’d grown up in walled spaces, and then he had become one. He had shut things out” (184).

I can’t choose what these narrators do.

I can’t turn off the news and start a loaf of bread. I can’t be lulled by pizza and sex.

My eyes have to stay open, even with the tears.

My voice has to stay loud, even though I’m hoarse.

My heart has to keep beating to fuel this fight, even though I’m weary.

Atwood has written the warning.

I must heed the call.

Share
0 comments

London by the Numbers (2018)

Travel

shortest amount of sleep in one night: 3 hrs

longest amount of sleep in one night: 15 hours

Michelin restaurants: 1 (but twice)

Nandos: 1

museums: 8

plays: 4

books read: 2

New Yorkers read: 2

London wineries (Renegade) visited: 1

tapas style dinners: 6 (2 Indian places, 1 Malaysian, 1 Spanish, 1 Greek)

ideas for a British porno: 1 (“Alas, Poor Fanny”)

times Karlissa decided it was easier and safer to take a cab instead of trying to find the nearest tube stop, due to lateness of night and amount of wine consumed: 1

drinks in ancient church crypts: 1

detailed descriptions of ripping urethras: 2

Indian desserts made from carrots and peanuts: 1

Lebanese wines: 1

Lebanese beers: 1

Servings of duck: 4

Summer blackberries consumed: 0

Sadness about lack of summer blackberries: endless

Toffee yogurts: 2

Songs played by the St. Martin’s in the field orchestra for the few moments we popped in before a show: 3

Times we should not have trusted the waitress when she said the portions were small: 1

Times an asshole cut in line in a cafe after saying he was late for yoga, but then asking that his croissant be toasted: 1

Indian-spiced fried okra servings: 2

one of the best plays of our lives: 1

one of the worst plays of our lives: 1

bottles of wine at the first wine bar in London: 2

dresses observed made from pineapple leaves: 2

music videos I made people watch by Ninja Sex Party: 2

times we almost fell in the bathroom due to a weird, poorly located step: 7

10 at night on the Thames

Share
0 comments

Finally: A Raise

Teaching

I just got a raise.

It’s a long story, though.

Every three years, I come up for review. As a union member, if I’m rehired, I get a 6% raise every three years–this is dependent on my being “excellent.”

In Fall 2015, I put together a review packet and asked for a merit raise of 3% in addition to the regular one. Why? Well, research faculty get raises for publications, for editing journals, for presentations, etc. I am the author of several books and articles. I edit a peer-reviewed journal. Etc. All but one of the tenured faculty in my department supported that request, which was then forwarded to the decision makers.

In Spring of 2016, I was nominated for and received a teaching award.

A few weeks later, UC Davis told me that I could not get a merit award–that it was great that I do all this research and publishing, but that I can’t ever get a raise for it, since I’m teaching faculty instead of research faculty. (Research faculty (aka tenure track), by the way, are the ones who get to vote on things like my raises.) In other words, they said since publishing wasn’t part of my job–something I’m already paid to do–I can’t get a raise for it, like they can. (I don’t think they understand what raises are for.)

They said that the only way I could get a raise was to win a teaching award or to publish a textbook. They mentioned that since my teaching was amazing, I would likely get a teaching award soon.

I appealed, noting that in between asking and being denied, I had in fact won that award. I also noted that since they could tell I deserved one, I should have gotten a raise anyway–they were looking at the same materials the award committee was, after all.

And you can only win that award once. And only two are granted a year, so that means a bunch of amazing teachers won’t ever get the raises they deserve.

In my appeal, I also made the argument that if the only part of my job that counted was my teaching, I should get a raise for serving on a dissertation committee and for teaching independent study classes. Both are teaching. Both are unpaid labor. In fact, when I teach independent studies, the university gets paid by the student, but I don’t get paid at all.

I swayed half of the committee to reevaluate. The dean broke the tie, denying the merit raise.

Three more years have come and gone. In that time, I have done even more professional development, I have attended more conferences, given more interviews, published more articles and books, taught more “free” classes, done more admin work (paid and unpaid), etc.

And one of those publications was the textbook I authored with Melissa.

Within the last three years, someone who won the teaching award after me has gotten her raise.

Melissa has gotten a raise for our book.

So this fall, when I turned in my packet, I argued that I should get the union 6%, 3% for the 2015 teaching award, and 3% for the textbook.

About half of the tenured faculty in my department agreed. The other half said I should just get 3% (like Melissa did, which would have negated my teaching award entirely).

One faculty member, the one who said I didn’t deserve merit last time, wrote a red herring argument about how she hated one small piece of my admin work, which went into the file.

So I was worried.

Today, however, I learned that I got my 12%. By one vote.

Share
1 comment

Karma Reads Books: Beowulf by Garcia and Rubin

Misc–karmic mistakes?, Words, words, words

Two Waltonens agree: meh.

We both wanted to like this book: we’re graphic novel fans, and there are some interesting things happening with the art here . . .

But meh.

Beowulf isn’t a great story–it’s old, and it was originally poetic, but this version replaces the poetry with images, and they just aren’t interesting enough to make the story compelling.

The authors also make a weird choice.

I won’t spoil it, but I will say I had to go back to figure out if I was seeing what I thought I was seeing. There is an art choice that changes a dynamic in a fundamental way–but then it is NEVER explained or addressed. Thus, it’s just confusing. It’s also an image I would like to get out of my mind.

Share
0 comments

Karma Reads Books: Every Heart a Doorway

Words, words, words

I have been passing around Seanan McGuire’s Every Heart a Doorway for a month now.

It’s a lovely little book and a very quick read.

The premise makes the book sound more juvenile than it is–you know all those old tales of children disappearing into fairy realms–and how they sometimes come back?

In this book, that happens. And then parents don’t understand–don’t believe their children. Surely their children were abducted–surely they’re repressing something.

And so many of those children wind up at a boarding school, run by another who has returned.

This story is dark in all the right ways–with longing and loss and death.

Like all good fantasies, it poses moral questions about our own world–what do we do with those who don’t fit in? Why don’t we believe our children when they tell us who they really are–that they’re asexual, that our little “girl” is actually a boy, that they long for something we can never give?

Share
0 comments

Karma Reads Books: Etched in Bone by Anne Bishop

Words, words, words

Last night, instead of sleeping, I finished Etched in Bone by Anne Bishop, the fifth book in The Others series.

My friend April first turned me on to it–it’s urban fantasy (fantastical creatures, but in our time instead of a medieval time).

This is an alternate version of our world, one in which the great spirits and creatures (vampires, werewolves, etc.) and humans exist, knowing about each other. The landmass that we call America was “discovered” by humans, and the humans made pacts with the powers that were there–sometimes trading goods for permission to live and to expand.

Except now the humans have forgotten how powerful the Others are and think they can break the compacts that have kept them from being prey.

Many fantasy stories have naive protagonists so that we can discover how the world works the same time they do.

Our protagonist is Meg–not quite human, not quite other. She is a prophet–like others of her kind, she has been caged and abused.

The first book opens with her running away and finding shelter at Lakeside–a unique community wherein Others and Humans try to coexist in the same space (the Others want to study us).

There’s a lot going on in this series–The Humans First and Last Movement sound and act a lot like our alt-right. And while the Others might both be read as Native Americans (with the power and inclination for revenge for what we stole), there are communities of intuits who resemble our idea of the spiritual Native American. There are issues of equality, power, community vs. the individual, the problems of mating, etc. The book also doesn’t shy away from the reality that human men abuse others (especially women) all the time. Reading the “savage” “animal” others judge us for our sins is necessary and sometimes difficult.

One of the things I appreciate about this series is something others might not–it’s a lot about how we make things work–how do we distribute resources equally? How many chances should a trouble maker give? When do you take a child away from a parent for its own good? How can you make a sad coworker feel better. There are a lot of conversations, misunderstandings, meetings–the things that usually don’t make for good fiction, but that add a wonderful layer of realism here.

Share
0 comments